math, philosophy of math, computer science:

A lot of mathematics is about proving theorems, but when a statement cannot be proven true or false we have the opportunity to better understand mathematics. I feel that we, unfortunately, do not take advantage of those opportunities. As our understanding of mathematics grows, we may ask more questions that land on the boundary of what we can know. I expect that it will only become more important to grapple with logical independence.
modern math is silly
meta-mathematics
undefinability and incompleteness some examples
Cantor's legacy
Forgetlessness
the difficulty of proofs of the difficulty of problems
topology is connectedness and locality Do topologists really run around daycare facilities slapping the hands of children for poking holes in silly putty or rolling together more than one piece of play dough?

Are choice functions misnamed?
for permutaion's sake
dovetailing diagonalization a hint on diagnolization
PNP here! more: older counting depth first search run-times, dfs_times.csv, graph_stuff.py
the algebra of Hamiltonians: lattices in one direction, trees in the other
Black Swan the Bayesian
block chain for enforcing abstractions limit your attack surface, lower maitenence and running costs
parallel merge
encapsulation protocol provide isolation as a service
computably approximatizable a better name for co-RE / co-CE
measurable sets
usefulness of dynamic typing
a theory of synchroniation
dontuse a toy programming language

philosophy, politics:

I have no friends. My best is not enough. How and why are people set up to fail?
You are what you believe
mourning
What makes a scapegoat successful?
two party system
small government, little justice
gentleman's four letter word
blaming the victim is fun how has the American dream come to this?
love of truth
society
the last gift
both sides
conservative justice
software law
Be yourself: cruelest of the ___ yourselfs
paint the wall

other:

responsible words

Notes to self